CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMPETITION - INFORMATION OBLIGATION

Unfair competition: The Court of Cassation confirms that the informations on key feature of a computer provided with operating systems and applications, must be given by the professional seller to the consumer (UFC Que choisir, Darty)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience.

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Laurent Roberval, Unfair competition: The Court of Cassation confirms that the informations on key feature of a computer provided with operating systems and applications, must be given by the professional seller to the consumer (UFC Que choisir, Darty), 6 October 2011, Concurrences N° 4-2011, Art. N° 39986, p. 133

Visites 418

All reviews