*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, October 4, 2011, Gefco c/ Frigo 7-Locatex, n° 10-20240 It is by a ruling of principle that the Court of Cassation dismisses the application of Article L. 442-6 of the Commercial Code in favour of the period of notice provided for in the standard transport
CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SUDDEN TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS – DURATION OF SPECIAL NOTICE IN TRANSPORT AND LAW OF RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES
Sudden termination of commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation gives priority to the delay of notice provided by the framework law on the internal transport (LOTI) about the notice proportionate to the length of the commercial relationships required by the Article L. 442-6 I-5° of the Commercial Code (Gefco/Frigo 7-Locatex)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.