Participation to the infringement – Repeated infringement: The General Court annuls the contested decision for lack of evidence concerning the participation of certain applicants in the infringement and the legal conditions for increasing the fine of others for recidivism (Shell Petroleum, ENI, Dow Chemical, Kaučuk, Unipetrol, Trade-Stomil and Polimeri Europa, “Rubber”)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. GCEU, 13 July 2011, Shell Petroleum a.o. v. Commission, Case T-38/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, ENI v. Commission, Case T-39/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Dow Chemical a.o. v. Commission, Case T-42/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Kaučuk v. Commission, case T-44/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Unipetrol v. Commission, Case T-45/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Trade-Stomil v. Commission, Case T-53/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Polimeri Europa v. Commission, Case T-59/07, "Rubber". In seven judgments delivered on 13 July 2011, the General Court generally annulled Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a