*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. GCEU, 13 July 2011, Shell Petroleum a.o. v. Commission, Case T-38/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, ENI v. Commission, Case T-39/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Dow Chemical a.o. v. Commission, Case T-42/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Kaučuk v. Commission, case T-44/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Unipetrol v. Commission, Case T-45/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Trade-Stomil v. Commission, Case T-53/07, "Rubber". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Polimeri Europa v. Commission, Case T-59/07, "Rubber". In seven judgments delivered on 13 July 2011, the General Court generally annulled Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a
CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ARTICLE 101 TFEU – MARKET FOR BUTADIENE RUBBER AND EMULSION STYRENE BUTADIENE RUBBER – PARTICIPATION TO THE INFRINGEMENT – BURDEN OF PROOF – REPEATED INFRINGEMENT
Participation to the infringement – Repeated infringement: The General Court annuls the contested decision for lack of evidence concerning the participation of certain applicants in the infringement and the legal conditions for increasing the fine of others for recidivism (Shell Petroleum, ENI, Dow Chemical, Kaučuk, Unipetrol, Trade-Stomil and Polimeri Europa, “Rubber”)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.