CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – INVOICING REGULATIONS – POSSIBILITY TO MENTION CONDITIONAL REBATES ON INVOICE

Invoicing regulations: The Court of Cassation rules that Article L .441-3 of the Code of commerce does not prohibit to mention conditional rebates on invoice (Microcar)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, September 6, 2011, Mr. X... Mr. Y...and Mrs. Z... c/ Microcar, n° 10-17963 The contract concluded between a supplier and a car distributor provided that the latter would be granted various kinds of price reductions,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Mireille Dany (Paris)
    France 35 contributions 52574 visits

Quotation

Mireille Dany, Invoicing regulations: The Court of Cassation rules that Article L .441-3 of the Code of commerce does not prohibit to mention conditional rebates on invoice (Microcar), 6 September 2011, Concurrences N° 4-2011, Art. N° 39968, p. 124

Visites 521

All reviews