CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURES – INTERIM RELIEF – GENERAL COURT

Interim relief: The President of General Court dismisses six requests for interim relief (DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital, Eurallumina, Emme, Fapricela, Cemex, Cementos Portland Valderrivas)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Trib. UE (ord. prés.), 9 June 2011, DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital v Commission, Case T-533/10 R Trib. EU (Pres. Ord.), 10 June 2011, Eurallumina v. Commission, Case T-207/07 R Trib. UE (ord. prés.), 12 July 2011, Emme v. Commission, aff. T-422/10 R Trib. UE (ord. prés.), 15 July 2011, Fapricela v. Commission, Case T-398/10 R Trib. UE (ord. prés.), 29 July 2011, Cemex and Others v. Commission, Case T-292/11 R Trib. UE (ord. prés.), 29 July 2011, Cementos Portland Valderrivas v. Commission, Case T-296/11 R Six new decisions refusing interim measures again illustrate the rigour with which the Tribunal applies the conditions for granting emergency

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Pascal Cardonnel, Interim relief: The President of General Court dismisses six requests for interim relief (DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital, Eurallumina, Emme, Fapricela, Cemex, Cementos Portland Valderrivas), 9 June 2011, Concurrences N° 4-2011, Art. N° 40030, pp. 173-175

Visites 489

All reviews