CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – DOMESTIC MARKETS – BEST PLACED AUTHORITY – IMPUTABILITY – PARENT-SUBSIDIARY RELATIONSHIP – PRESUMPTION OF DECISIVE INFLUENCE – REPEATED INFRINGEMENT

Imputability - Repeated infringement: The General Court confirms the existence of a single and continuous infringement but reduces the fine for non compliance with recidivism principles (Installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. GCEU, 13 July 2011, ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs a.o. v. Commission, joined cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07, "Installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators ". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Koné a.o. v. Commission, Case T-151/07, "Installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators ". GCEU, 13 July 2011, Schindler Holding a.o. v. Commission, Case T-138/07, "Installation and

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Rizom Legal (Paris)

Quotation

Michel Debroux, Imputability - Repeated infringement: The General Court confirms the existence of a single and continuous infringement but reduces the fine for non compliance with recidivism principles (Installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators), 13 July 2011, Concurrences N° 4-2011, Art. N° 39926, pp. 90-91

Visites 682

All reviews