CASE COMMENT : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - CARTEL - PARENT COMPANY/SUBSIDIARY - RIGHTS OF DEFENCE

Cartel: The General Court confirms its case-law regarding the imputability for actions of subsidiaries to the parent company (Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate cartel)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. TEU, July 14, 2011, T-189/06, Arkema France / Commission On July 14, 2011, the Court of First Instance of the European Union handed down a ruling that marks a new failure by Total and Elf Aquitaine, and incidentally of their subsidiary Arkema, in their attempt to put back into Cause the Commission's decision-making practice validated by case law of the Court of First Instance and of the Court of Justice concerning the application of a presumption that the parent company effectively exercises influence over the company's operations. on the behaviour of its wholly-owned subsidiary and, consequently, on the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Cartel: The General Court confirms its case-law regarding the imputability for actions of subsidiaries to the parent company (Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate cartel), 14 July 2011, Concurrences N° 4-2011, Art. N° 52905, www.concurrences.com

Visites 160

All reviews