CASE COMMENT : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - PROOF - IMPUTABILITY TO THE PARENT COMPANY OF THE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF ITS SUBSIDIARY

Imputability of unlawful conduct: The General Court reminds at the Commission the need to substantiate the imputability of the mother of the unlawful conduct of its subsidiary (Dutch beer case)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The European Commission has failed to establish, under the terms of its Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 sanctioning a market cartel beer, that Koninklijke Grolsch NV, the parent company of the Dutch beer group, that Koninklijke Grolsch NV, the parent company of the Dutch beer group, that Koninklijke Grolsch NV, the parent company of the Dutch beer group, that Koninklijke Grolsch NV, the parent company of the Dutch beer group, that Koninklijke Grolsch NV, the parent company of the Dutch beer group, that Koninklijke Grolsch NV, the parent company of the Dutch beer group, that Koninklijke Grolsch NV, the parent company of the Dutch beer group, that

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Imputability of unlawful conduct: The General Court reminds at the Commission the need to substantiate the imputability of the mother of the unlawful conduct of its subsidiary (Dutch beer case), 15 September 2011, Concurrences N° 4-2011, Art. N° 54122, www.concurrences.com

Visites 96

All reviews