CASE COMMENTS : UNILATERAL PRACTICES - ABUSE OF A DOMINANT POSITION - EXCLUSIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT - FIDELITY REBATES - PER SE APPROACH

Exclusivity - Fidelity rebates : The General Court upholds the Commission decision re-instating sanctions against a pharmaceutical undertaking for an infringement already established in a previous decision, which had been annulled for procedural reasons (Imperial Chemical Industries)

KEYWORDS

L'intérêt principal de l'arrêt ICI est procédural. Il tranche en effet un recours contre une décision de la Commission condamnant à nouveau une infraction déjà constatée il y a près de dix ans, dans une décision qui avait été annulée pour des raisons de procédure. Du point de vue du droit des pratiques unilatérales, l'arrêt comporte très peu de développements méritant un

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Université Catholique de Louvain
    Belgium 94 articles 126094 visits

Quotation

Anne-Lise Sibony, Exclusivity - Fidelity rebates : The General Court upholds the Commission decision re-instating sanctions against a pharmaceutical undertaking for an infringement already established in a previous decision, which had been annulled for procedural reasons (Imperial Chemical Industries), 25 June 2010, Concurrences Review N° 4-2010, Art. N° 33189, pp. 125-126

Visites 986

See updates for:

All reviews