CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURE - EC LAW - MERGER CONTROL - UNDERTAKINGS

Undertaking/commitment - Appeal: The CFI holds that the EC Commission’s interpretation of the terms of an undertaking cannot be subject to an action for annulment (E.ON)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. IFC, 2 September 2009, E.ON v. Commission, Case T-57/07 The concentration regulation seeks to prevent rather than cure. In the action for annulment (Article 230(4) EC), the exact opposite is true. The inadmissibility order E.ON v Commission demonstrates this. The Commission has declared compatible the acquisition by two companies of the German E.ON group of two companies of the Hungarian oil group MOL (Case COMP/M.3696 - E.ON v. MOL). This decision was subject to certain conditions and obligations, in particular the fulfilment of commitments to divest a total

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Pascal Cardonnel, Undertaking/commitment - Appeal: The CFI holds that the EC Commission’s interpretation of the terms of an undertaking cannot be subject to an action for annulment (E.ON), 2 September 2009, Concurrences N° 4-2009, Art. N° 29302, pp. 178-179

Visites 1785

All reviews