CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - ARTICLE 81 EC - MARKET AND PRODUCTS - OBLIGATION TO STATE REASONS

Obligation to State reasons: The ECJ rejects the appeal against the CFI’s judgment (William Prym)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. ECJ, 3 September 2009, William Prym GmbH & Co KG and Others v Commission, Case C-534/07 P In support of their appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 December 2007 in Case T 30/05 Prym and Prym Consummer v Commission (not published in the ECR) (see note C. S., ConcurrencesNo. 4-2007, pp. 64-65.), the applicants put forward five pleas in law, alleging, first, infringement of the rights of the defence and of the obligation to state reasons in the administrative procedure division, second, the prohibition of denial of justice and, third, the prohibition of the denial of justice, the CFI's failure to

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Obligation to State reasons: The ECJ rejects the appeal against the CFI’s judgment (William Prym), 3 September 2009, Concurrences N° 4-2009, Art. N° 29221, www.concurrences.com

Visites 1843

All reviews