CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - ARTICLE 81 EC - CITRIC ACID MARKET - FINES - ROLE OF LEADER - STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS - ANNEX

Annulation of judgment: The ECJ partially annuls the CFI’s judgment in the citric acid case (Archer Daniels Midlands)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. ECJ, 9 July 2009, Archer Daniels Midlands Co. v. Commission, Case C-511/06 P In support of his appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 27 September 2006 in Case T 59/02 Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) v Commission [2006] ECR II 3627 (see footnote M. D, Concurrences, n° 4-2006), the applicant put forward nine pleas in law based, in substance, on various errors of law allegedly committed by the CFI as regards the classification of ADM as the leader of the cartel and the refusal to grant ADM the benefit of mitigating circumstances relating to the termination of its participation in the cartel, the application of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Annulation of judgment: The ECJ partially annuls the CFI’s judgment in the citric acid case (Archer Daniels Midlands), 9 July 2009, Concurrences N° 4-2009, Art. N° 29217, pp. 90-91

Visites 2139

All reviews