Rebuttable presumption where the parent company has a 100% shareholding.: The ECJ confirms its jurisprudence on the liability of the parent company for the actions of its subsidiary and considers the capital presumption as being hardly rebuttable (Akzo Nobel)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Court of Justice confirms its jurisprudence on the liability of the parent company for the actions of its subsidiary and considers the capital presumption as being hardly rebuttable. ECJ, 10 September 2009, C-97/08 P, Case Akzo Nobel and Others v Commission On 10 September the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivered its judgment in the case of 2009, a much-awaited judgment in Case C-97/08 (Akzo Nobel NV and Others v. Belgium). v. Commission) concerning the rules for attributing infringements of Community law to a Member State. competition to parent companies where such infringements have been committed by its subsidiaries. Some had