*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In support of their appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 December 2007 in Case T 30/05 Prym and Prym Consummer v Commission (not published in the ECR) (see note C. S., ConcurrencesNo. 4-2007, pp. 64-65.), the applicants put forward five pleas in law, alleging, first, infringement of the rights of the defence and of the obligation to state reasons in the administrative procedure division, second, the prohibition of denial of justice and, third, the prohibition of the denial of justice, the CFI's failure to take sufficient account of the Commission's finding of infringement of the obligation to state
CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - ARTICLE 81 EC - MARKET AND PRODUCTS - OBLIGATION TO STATE REASONS
Obligation of state reasons: The ECJ rejects the appeal against the CFI’s judgment (William Prym)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.