Forgive us for plagiarising the title of Martine Lombard's recentbook published before the summer... The title in the singular - its demonstration concerns only France - and affirmative was particularly premonitory. After the events of recent weeks, it is tempting to add a plural and a question mark? Would the data have changed that much between the beginning and the end of the summer? Is there a contradiction between the desire to "mobilise competition as a new lever for growth", which appears in the title of Title II of the law on the modernisation of the economy, known as the LME law, and the series of measures adopted in recent weeks, both in the European Union and across the Atlantic, and in which everyone agrees to see a significant return by the States. Even if the two
|
FOREWORD - COMPETITION POLICY - FINANCIAL CRISIS - FRENCH REFORM
Competition policy and the return of the State: Are States two-sided ?
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.
Is there a contradiction between the desire to "mobilise competition as a new lever for growth", which appears in the title of Title II of the law on the modernisation of the economy, known as the LME law, and the series of measures adopted in recent weeks, both in the European Union and across the Atlantic, which everyone agrees to see as a significant return by the states? Even if the two movements can be reconciled, at the end of the year there are still many questions.
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
