*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CA Bordeaux, 5 February 2008, SARL So.Go.Bois c/ SAS Seguin Moreau, RG 06/05969 – Cass. com, 23 September 2008, Teixagol v. Temaco, No. 07-10.025. To what extent is the fault of one party to an established commercial relationship likely to justify a termination without notice at the initiative of the other? It is on this question that the Court of Appeal of Bordeaux on 5 February 2008 and the Court of Cassation on 23 September 2008 both considered this question, giving a somewhat divergent answer. First species The case before the Bordeaux Court of Appeal involved a supplier of staves, the company So. Go. Bois, against one of its user clients, the
CASE COMMENT : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - SUDDEN BREAKING-OFF OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIP - COMMERCE CODE AND CIVIL CODE
Established commercial relationships : The Court of Cassation and the Bordeaux Court of Appeal adopt a different approach as far as the misconduct likely to justify an immediate termination of the relationship is concerned (Teixagol c/ Temaco)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.