Predatory pricing: The European Court of Justice Advocate General Mazák supports that it is necessary to demonstrate the possibilty of recoupment of loss to prove a practice of predatory pricing and invites the Court of Justice to strike down the decision of the Court of First Instance (France Télécom)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Advocate General Mazák presented today, 25 September 2008, his Opinion in Case C-202/07 (France Télécom SA v Commission). On 16 April 2007, France Telecom appealed against the judgment delivered on 30 April 2007 in Case T-107/07. January 2007 in Case T-340/03, pursuant to which the Court of First Instance of the European Communities, in Case T-340/03, held that the First Instance of the European Communities has fully confirmed the Commission Decision of 16 July 2003 in which the Commission had found that Wanadoo Interactive had infringed Article 82 EC by for its eXtense and Wanadoo ADSL services at predatory prices. to cover its variable costs until August