CASE COMMENT: COLLUSIVE PRACTICES - RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - MARKET AND PRODUCTS SHARING - FINES

Restrictive practices: The CFI confirms the Commission’s decision but reduces the amount of the fine (William Prym GmbH)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CFI, 12 September 2007, William Prym GmbH & Co KG, Prym Consumer GmbH & Co KG v. Commission, Case T-30/05 An action for annulment brought by William Prym and Prym Consumer (hereinafter 'the applicants') was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities. The Court of First Instance of the European Communities upheld Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004, in which it found that the applicants had participated in a series of anti-competitive agreements on the European haberdashery (needles) market, together with two other competing undertakings and their respective subsidiaries, namely, on the one hand,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Restrictive practices: The CFI confirms the Commission’s decision but reduces the amount of the fine (William Prym GmbH), 12 September 2007, Concurrences N° 4-2007, Art. N° 14368, pp. 64-65

Visites 3968

All reviews