CASE COMMENT: COLLUSIVE PRACTICES - RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - DISTRIBUTION - MOTORCYCLES - SINGLE AND MULTI-BRANDING - EXCLUSIVE AND SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION - DISCRIMINATION - NON-COMPETE PROVISIONS

Non-compete provision: The French Competition Council upholds most of several provisions contained in distribution contracts for motorcycles and imposes a modest fine to a post-contract non-compete provision (CNPA Motorcycles)

Cons. conc., déc. n° 07-D-25 du 25 juillet 2007 relative aux saisines du CNPA à l'encontre de certains constructeurs de motocycles concernant les conditions de distribution de leurs produits Saisi par le Conseil National des Professions de l'Automobile (CNPA), le Conseil de la concurrence a examiné en détail un grand nombre de stipulations insérées dans leurs contrats de distribution par les principaux fabricants de véhicules à moteur à deux roues immatriculés (Suzuki, Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki). De cet examen pointilleux, effectué tant sous l'angle de l'article L.420-1 du code de commerce que de l'article 81 du

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Michel Debroux, Non-compete provision: The French Competition Council upholds most of several provisions contained in distribution contracts for motorcycles and imposes a modest fine to a post-contract non-compete provision (CNPA Motorcycles), 25 July 2007, Concurrences Review N° 4-2007, Art. N° 14376, pp. 69-70

Visites 3705

All reviews