CASE COMMENT: COLLUSIVE PRACTICES - RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS - PUBLIC TENDER - RAILWAYS WORKS

Fines: The Paris Court of Appeal reduces the amount of fines imposed for anticompetitive agreements, having regard to the size of the market and the financial situation of one of the companies (Railways works)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, 1st ch. H, October 2, 2007v. Council, Dec. No. 06-D-15Railway track laying and maintenance sector The reductions or - rare - increases by the Paris Court of Appeal of the pecuniary penalties imposed by the Competition Council are decidedly tricky to interpret. The Court ruled on the appeal lodged against Competition Council Decision

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Michel Debroux, Fines: The Paris Court of Appeal reduces the amount of fines imposed for anticompetitive agreements, having regard to the size of the market and the financial situation of one of the companies (Railways works), 2 October 2007, Concurrences N° 4-2007, Art. N° 14380, pp. 71-72

Visites 3842

All reviews