CASE COMMENT: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - UNFAIR COMPETITION - EVENT FOR LIABILITY

Unfair competition: The Court of Cassation holds that an act of unfair competition attributable to a competitor of the victim is required for an unfair competition action to be brought (Europe funérailles c/ Funéfrance Funéclair)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – Cass. com, 11 July 2006, Europe funérailles v/ Funéfrance Funéclair, n° 02-18.229 Based on articles 1382 and 1383 of the Civil Code, an action for unfair competition requires proof of fault (Cass. com., 16 May 1995, No. 93-17.842; Cass. com., 30 May 2000, No. 98-15.549, Contracts, conc., consom. 2001, comm. No. 161; Cass. 1st civ., 18 Jan. 2005, No. 03-15.911). It is appropriate to punish a wrongful harmful act and the action in unfair competition cannot be accepted on the basis of a presumption of liability because of the very existence of the principle of free competition. It is in line with this case law that the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • University Littoral-Côte d’Opale (Boulogne-sur-Mer)
  • University Littoral-Côte d’Opale

Quotation

Daniel Fasquelle, Servane Morel, Unfair competition: The Court of Cassation holds that an act of unfair competition attributable to a competitor of the victim is required for an unfair competition action to be brought (Europe funérailles c/ Funéfrance Funéclair), 11 July 2006, Concurrences N° 4-2006, Art. N° 12471, p. 83

Visites 5167

All reviews