CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURES - RIGHTS OF DEFENSE - NOTIFIED OBJECTIONS - DIFFERING ANALYSIS OF THE REPORT

Appeal: The Paris Court of Appel decides that there is no violation of the adversarial principle where the French Competition Council takes a view of the practice put forward in the report, that may differ from the one in the statement of objections, and relies on documents that have all been notified to the parties (Hôtel Le Bristol)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CA Paris, 1st ch. H, 26 September 2006, Hôtel Le Bristol and others.against Cons. conc., Dec. no. 05-D-64 a so-called Parisian palace

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Valérie Michel-Amsellem, Appeal: The Paris Court of Appel decides that there is no violation of the adversarial principle where the French Competition Council takes a view of the practice put forward in the report, that may differ from the one in the statement of objections, and relies on documents that have all been notified to the parties (Hôtel Le Bristol), 26 September 2006, Concurrences N° 4-2006, Art. N° 12517

Visites 4204

All reviews