*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 13 September 2006, British Aggregates Association v Commission, Case T-210/02 The judgment in British Aggregates ('BA') deserves mention because of its dual interest from the point of view of procedural law on State aid, which, as is well known, is probably not the simplest or most logical area of Community litigation, but which, as the latest issues of this column have pointed out, has recently made clear progress in this direction. The admissibility test established by the ARE judgment applies to all appeals against a decision not to raise objections to new aid The first of these two interests is the confirmation - as explicit as comity allows -
CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURES - STATE AIDS - LITIGATION - ACTION FOR ANNULMENT - ADMISSIBILITY - STANDING - INDIVIDUAL CONCERN - DECISION NOT TO RAISE OBJECTIONS
Action for annulment: The CFI holds that there is no need to differentiate the analysis of standing to act against a decision not to raise objections according to whether an aid scheme or an individual aid is challenged (British Aggregates)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.