*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 28 September 2006, Advocate General Geelhoed delivered his Opinion in Cases C-376/05 and C-377/05 (Brünsteiner and Others). The present case, which follows references for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesgerichtshof, forms part of the wave of cases
CASE COMMENT : DISTRIBUTION - HARDCORE RESTRICTION - BLOCK EXEMPTION - DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT - INTERIM PERIOD
Hardcore restriction : The Advocate General Geelhoed is in favour of the invalidity of the hardcore restrictions in contracts held beyond the transitional period of one year laid down in Regulation 1400/2002 (Brünsteiner)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.