CASE COMMENT : DISTRIBUTION - HARDCORE RESTRICTION - BLOCK EXEMPTION - DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT - INTERIM PERIOD

Hardcore restriction : The Advocate General Geelhoed is in favour of the invalidity of the hardcore restrictions in contracts held beyond the transitional period of one year laid down in Regulation 1400/2002 (Brünsteiner)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Conc. AG Geelhoed, 28 septembre 2006, Affaires jointes C-376/05 et C-377/05

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 28 September 2006, Advocate General Geelhoed delivered his Opinion in Cases C-376/05 and C-377/05 (Brünsteiner and Others). The present case, which follows references for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesgerichtshof, forms part of the wave of cases

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)
    France 4522 contributions 1119166 visits

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Hardcore restriction : The Advocate General Geelhoed is in favour of the invalidity of the hardcore restrictions in contracts held beyond the transitional period of one year laid down in Regulation 1400/2002 (Brünsteiner), 28 September 2006, Concurrences N° 4-2006, Art. N° 56120, www.concurrences.com

Visites 53

All reviews