CASE COMMENT : COLLECTIVE DOMINANCE - REPRISAL - EFFECTS ON COMPETITION

Collective dominance : The Competition Council renders a decision n° 06-D-18 concerning practices implemented in the sector of film advertising (Circuit A/Screenvision, Mediavision)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 28 June 2006, the Competition Council issued Decision No. 06-D-18 relating to practices in the advertising industry cinematic, an interesting decision in more ways than one. So he has identified in this case a collective dominant position in the markets for the of the national film advertising board without falling within the scope of of abuse from the head of the duopoly. Firstly, with regard to collective dominance, the Council has recalled that the existence of structural links between companies on the one hand, such as capital ties or formalized agreements between them, and the adoption of a common line of action on the market, on the other hand,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Collective dominance : The Competition Council renders a decision n° 06-D-18 concerning practices implemented in the sector of film advertising (Circuit A/Screenvision, Mediavision), 28 June 2006, Concurrences N° 4-2006, Art. N° 55734, www.concurrences.com

Visites 115

All reviews