CASE COMMENT : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - FINE - CARTEL - FINE CALCULATION - PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY

Citric acid cartel : The CFI confirms the conclusions and sanctions pronounced by the Commission in the citric acid cartel case (Jungbunzlauer, Archer Daniels Midland)

KEYWORDS
Reference

TPICE, 27 septembre 2006, aff. T-43/02, Jungbunzlauer / Commission

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CFI, 27 September 2006, Case T-59/02, Archer Daniels Midland v Commission Reference should be made to the judgments in the citric acid cartel case, where one of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)
    France 4520 contributions 1117815 visits

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Citric acid cartel : The CFI confirms the conclusions and sanctions pronounced by the Commission in the citric acid cartel case (Jungbunzlauer, Archer Daniels Midland), 27 September 2006, Concurrences N° 4-2006, Art. N° 56081, www.concurrences.com

Visites 151

All reviews