CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - VERTICAL AGREEMENT - BEER CONTRACT DISTRIBUTION - SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION - ANCILLARY RESTRAINTS

Selective Distribution: The French Competition Council restates principles governing the validity of selective distribution agreements (SCOB - Kronenbourg)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Concordance, Dec. 05-D-50 of 21 September 2005 on the complaint of the company SCOB against practices implemented by the company Brasseries Kronenbourg in the beer distribution sector The decision just issued by the Competition Council concerning practices implemented by the Kronenbourg company makes it possible to take stock of the conditions of validity of selective distribution. This company has indeed set up a selective distribution contract for the distribution of cask beer. Under this contract, the distributor undertakes to purchase Kronenbourg branded cask-conditioned beers in France only from Kronenbourg or other distributors authorised by the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Paris II Panthéon‑Assas

Quotation

Emmanuelle Claudel, Selective Distribution: The French Competition Council restates principles governing the validity of selective distribution agreements (SCOB - Kronenbourg), 21 September 2005, Concurrences N° 4-2005, Art. N° 660, pp. 69-70.

Visites 5026

All reviews