*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The marriage of banking law and distribution law will not take place. At least that is the feeling that dominates on reading the of the decision rendered on June 15 by the Court of Cassation. By condemning advances on remittances in the name of the monopoly, it puts an end to nearly 40 years of harmonious relations and harmonious relations and opens the way to new and much more much more tumultuous relationships. The case involves the company Fuchs, which is known for marketing several ranges of lubricants for motor vehicles, motorcycles, agricultural machinery and construction equipment. In 2012, the company entered into a contract with a company
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.