*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The legislator has chosen to establish a specialisation of the courts in the wake of litigation relating to restrictive competition practices. However, the implementation of this system continues to reveal its complexity. The decision rendered by the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation on March 31, 2021 provides a new illustration. The origin of the dispute was nothing but classic. Reproaching its co-contractor for serious faults, the MHCS company terminated the contract concluded with the latter. The dismissed contractor classically summoned his
CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES - SPECIALISED JURISDICTIONS - COMPETENCE
Exclusive jurisdiction: The French Supreme Court extends the exclusive jurisdiction of the Paris Court of Appeal to a subsidiary claim based on Article L. 442-6, I, 5° C. com. (MHCS)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.