CASE COMMENTS: PUBLIC PROCUREMENT - PUBLIC CONTRACT - AWARD CRITERIA - ECONOMICALLY MOST ADVANTAGEOUS OFFER

Award criteria: The French Supreme Administrative Court rules that the contracting authority must inform the candidates of the weighting of the sub-criteria if it has an influence on the selection of the offers (SNBTP)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The choice of the most economically advantageous tender is the high point of the public procurement procedure. From the definition of the need to the notification of the contract, the entire procedure is geared towards achieving this objective, which consists of objectively identifying the tenderer who best meets the need expressed by the contracting authority. This choice is made on the basis of the tender selection criteria laid down and published at the beginning of the procedure by the contracting authority, which has no discretionary power in this matter. In addition to Article R. 2152-7 C. comm. pub. which sets out a list of criteria that the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Municipality (Blanc-Mesnil)

Quotation

Djamel Hadef, Award criteria: The French Supreme Administrative Court rules that the contracting authority must inform the candidates of the weighting of the sub-criteria if it has an influence on the selection of the offers (SNBTP), 18 May 2021, Concurrences N° 3-2021, Art. N° 102055, pp. 204-206

Visites 84

All reviews