1620.Sudden break-up: The Paris Court of Appeal clarifies the effectiveness of the notice and on the compensation of a service provider brutally ousted who ceased his activity (Lokama / Madinina logistique)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Termination of the activity of the service provider who has been brutally evicted: what notice period, what damage?* Facts are that Nestlé France has been using two companies, subsidiaries of the same holding company, to provide logistics services for some fifteen years, one in Martinique and the other in Guadeloupe. The latest contract, like the previous ones, is for a fixed term of several years with an option to terminate without cause, with one year's notice. The contract was terminated before the end of the term at Nestlé's initiative in application of the latter option and apparently at the same time as a call for tenders was issued, the reality of