Single and continuous infringement: Advocate General Pitruzzella considers that the Commission’s finding of a single and continuous infringement does not imply that it is composed of several separate infringements (Sony, Quanta, Toshiba Samsung)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 3 June 2021, Advocate General Giovanni Pitruzzella delivered his Opinion on the two legal questions, on which the Court of Justice of the Union asked him following four appeals lodged by suppliers of optical disk drives seeking the annulment of four judgments delivered on 12 July 2019 in cases T-762/15 (Sony and Sony Electronics v European Commission) T-763/15 (Sony Optiarc and Sony Optiarc America v European Commission) T-772/15 (Quanta Storage v European Commission) and T-8/16 (Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology and Others v. European Commission) in which the General Court of the Union dismissed their appeals against the Commission's decision of 21