*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. It will be remembered that following a referral by Betclic, the Competition Authority had obtained commitments from PMU that it had made binding by Decision No. 14-D-04 of 25 February 2014....consisting mainly of separating its masses of hard and soft stakes. In December 2017, Betclic and Zeturf again brought a case before the Authority for non-compliance by PMU with this commitment. More specifically, the referral concerns the marketing by PMU of bets on foreign races under joint mass agreements with a foreign operator, both in its hard and online channels (pt. 44). This practice relates to five partnerships currently in force, for which the PMU is
ALERTS: PROCEDURES - FRANCE - SANCTIONS - COMMITMENTS - INTERNET
Commitments : The French Competition Authority imposes a financial penalty of €900,000 to an undertaking that failed to comply with the commitment to separate the pools of bets made online and through the physical network of outlets (PMU)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.