ALERTS: CARTELS - EUROPEAN UNION - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - AUDIOVISUAL - MEDIA - LICENCES - PROPORTIONALITY - COMMITMENTS

Commitments: Advocate General Pitruzzella calls on the Court of Justice of the European Union to uphold the appeal in the Cross-border access to pay-TV case on the grounds that the European Commission infringed the principle of proportionality by failing to take into account the interests of third parties (Canal+)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 7 May 2020, Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered his Opinion in Case C-132/19 (Canal+ Group v Commission).. It will be recalled that on 12 December 2018, the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered a judgment in Case T-873/16 (Canal+ Group v Commission).in which it dismissed the action brought by Canal+ Group for the annulment of the Commission's decision of July 26, 2016. under which the Commission had accepted and made binding the commitments entered into by the US studio Paramount in relation to the film content licensing agreements which the US studio had concluded with Sky for the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Commitments: Advocate General Pitruzzella calls on the Court of Justice of the European Union to uphold the appeal in the Cross-border access to pay-TV case on the grounds that the European Commission infringed the principle of proportionality by failing to take into account the interests of third parties (Canal+), 7 May 2020, Concurrences N° 3-2020, Art. N° 94883, www.concurrences.com

Visites 155

All reviews