CONFERENCE: COMPETITION POLICY - ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT - COMPENSATION - DAMAGES

Limitation period for actions for damages (3rd Private Enforcement Conference: The current state of private enforcement in the EU and France - Paris Court of Appeal, March 28th, 2019)

La transposition des règles sur la prescription de l'action en réparation en droits nationaux - Remarques comparatives Florian Bien [1] Professeur, Université de Wurtzbourg In its Manfredi and Cogéco judgments on the limitation period for actions for damages for breaches of competition law, the ECJ stressed the need to protect the victims' interest in obtaining compensation for their losses in order to ensure a more effective enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. Reflecting this case law, the European legislator has addressed the question of limitation in Articles 10, 11 and 18 of the Damage Directive, which has led to a minimum harmonisation of national limitation regimes while at the same time leaving room for significant differences to persist. The following overview provides a

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Florian Bien, Sylvaine Poillot-Peruzzetto, Mercedes Pedraz Calvo, Limitation period for actions for damages (3rd Private Enforcement Conference: The current state of private enforcement in the EU and France - Paris Court of Appeal, March 28th, 2019), September 2019, Concurrences Review N° 3-2019, Art. N° 90911, www.concurrences.com

Visites 135

All reviews