ALERTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - CONSUMER PROTECTION - ACCESS TO INFORMATION - HARM - LOSS OF AN OPPORTUNITY

Obligation to inform: The Paris Court of Appeal notes that a telecom operator has been guilty of consumer credit practices in breach of the provisions governing consumer information (Free / SFR)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In the mobile terminal subsidization case, Chamber 5-4 of the Paris Court of Appeal found that SFR was guilty of consumer credit practices in breach of the provisions governing consumer information, which constitute unfair competition, and ordered an expert appraisal to determine the amount of Free's damages in light of the loss of opportunity to contract with customers deceived by SFR. On April 24, 2019, Chamber 5-4 of the Paris Court of Appeals rendered a fine judgment on Irène Luc's report on the mobile terminal subsidy practices implemented by the operator SFR.. It will be remembered that the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Obligation to inform: The Paris Court of Appeal notes that a telecom operator has been guilty of consumer credit practices in breach of the provisions governing consumer information (Free / SFR), 24 April 2019, Concurrences N° 3-2019, Art. N° 90284, www.concurrences.com

Visites 207

All reviews