CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – FRANCE – SUDDEN TERMINATION – PRIOR NOTICE – SERIOUS MISCONDUCT

Sudden termination: The French Supreme Court rules that the non-compliance with an objective of turnover stipulated in the contract does not characterize a serious misconduct which could justify a termination without prior notice (AMT France / SB Electronic)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Fr. Sup. Court, April 5th, 2018, AMT France vs. SB Electronic, Case n° 16-19923, FR:CCASS:2018:CO00299

Dans cette affaire, le contrat prévoyait une obligation, à la charge du

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Mary-Claude Mitchell, Sudden termination: The French Supreme Court rules that the non-compliance with an objective of turnover stipulated in the contract does not characterize a serious misconduct which could justify a termination without prior notice (AMT France / SB Electronic), 5 April 2018, Concurrences Review N° 3-2018, Art. N° 87668, p. 126

Visites 65

See updates for:

All reviews