ALERTS: MERGERS - ENGAGEMENTS - EXEMPTION - PROPORTIONALITY - LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS - MISUSE OF POWER

Revision of commitments: The General Court of the European Union considers that the European Commission did not sufficiently examined the request of an airline company to revise engagements taken (Lufthansa)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Where an undertaking, which has accepted remedies, particularly of a behavioural nature, in order for a merger to be cleared by the Commission, seeks the lifting of all or part of these commitments, what elements must that undertaking put forward in order to obtain a review of the commitments entered into? At the same time, and in such a context, what are the Commission's prerogatives and obligations? These are, in essence, the questions raised in Case T-712/16 (Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission), in which the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered its judgment on 16 May 2018.. In 2005, the European Commission cleared under the EU Merger

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Revision of commitments: The General Court of the European Union considers that the European Commission did not sufficiently examined the request of an airline company to revise engagements taken (Lufthansa), 16 May 2018, Concurrences N° 3-2018, Art. N° 87079, www.concurrences.com

Visites 220

All reviews