CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – JURISDICTIONS

Trademark infringement action: The French Supreme Court holds that, in application of Regulation Brussels I, Article 6 (1) laying down rules governing the jurisdiction of courts and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, different requests for the same facts and rules - unfair competition and trademark infringement related to a golf equipment - characterizes a likelihood of irreconcilable solutions if ruled separately (Decathlon / Delta Handelskontor)

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne/Mer)

Quotation

Valérie Durand, Trademark infringement action: The French Supreme Court holds that, in application of Regulation Brussels I, Article 6 (1) laying down rules governing the jurisdiction of courts and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, different requests for the same facts and rules - unfair competition and trademark infringement related to a golf equipment - characterizes a likelihood of irreconcilable solutions if ruled separately (Decathlon / Delta Handelskontor), 1 September 2016, Concurrences Review Nº 3-2016, Art. N° 80841, p. 106

Visites 73

All reviews