CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION – PROPORTIONNALITY – CONTROL

Post-contract non compete clause: The French Supreme Court recalls the scope of a post-contractual non compete clause of a franchisee which must be justified by its geographic scope (Ucar / A2L)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Cass. com, 30 mars 2016, Ucar c/ A2L, n° 14-23261

Il ne suffit pas au franchiseur, pour justifier la stipulation d’une clause de non-concurrence à effet post-contractuel ayant une large assiette

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Montpellier
    France 99 contributions 114755 visits

Quotation

Didier Ferrier, Post-contract non compete clause: The French Supreme Court recalls the scope of a post-contractual non compete clause of a franchisee which must be justified by its geographic scope (Ucar / A2L) , 30 March 2016, Concurrences Review Nº 3-2016, Art. N° 80832, p. 98

Visites 159

All reviews