CASE COMMENTS: FOREIGN CASELAW – PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT – BURDEN OF PROOF – EXPERTISE

Italy: The Italian Supreme Court states that the judge should ease the burden of proof that lies with any person seeking compensation by using the expertise (Italian Trade Consultant)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a ruling of 23 March 2016, the Italian Court of Cassation urged the courts of first instance to facilitate the burden of proof on the victims of anti-competitive practices by resorting to judicial expertise ex officio. In the present case, an undertaking operating in the sector of production and marketing of information services based on the compilation of data contained in the public real estate registers and in the cadastre of land and buildings owned by an agency operating a service of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Silvia Pietrini, Italy: The Italian Supreme Court states that the judge should ease the burden of proof that lies with any person seeking compensation by using the expertise (Italian Trade Consultant), 23 March 2016, Concurrences Nº 3-2016, Art. N° 80933, pp. 184-185

Visites 143

All reviews