ALERT: STATE AID - COMPATIBILITY - SELECTIVE NATURE OF AN AID MEASURE - EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE - LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS - LEGAL CERTAINTY

Operating aid: The General Court of the European Union decides that the Commission correctly applied EU State aid rules in the case of mineral oils after having been twice overruled by the ECJ (Aughinish Alumina et al.)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 22 April 2016, the General Court of the European Union delivered three judgments in joined cases T-50/06 RENV II (Ireland v Commission) and T- 69/06 RENV II (Aughinish Alumina v Commission), in Case T-56/06 RENV II (France v Commission) and in Joined Cases T-60/06 RENV II (Italy v Commission) and T-62/06 RENV II (Eurallumina v Commission) by which it confirms the decision http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-cont... of 7 December 2005 ordering the repayment of tax exemptions granted by France, Ireland and Italy for alumina production. A brief reminder of the regulatory context in which this case takes place. Ireland, the Italian Republic and the French

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Operating aid: The General Court of the European Union decides that the Commission correctly applied EU State aid rules in the case of mineral oils after having been twice overruled by the ECJ (Aughinish Alumina et al.), 22 April 2016, Concurrences Nº 3-2016, Art. N° 81095, www.concurrences.com

Visites 98

All reviews