ALERTE : UNILATERAL PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - PREDATORY PRICING - EVIDENCE - APPEAL

Abuse of dominant position: The Paris Court of appeal reminds operators complaining about predatory prices that they must bring at least sufficient circumstantial evidence allowing to presume an actual infringement (Imperial Pub/GPS/La Poste/Mediapost)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 13 April 2016, Chamber 5-4 of the Paris Court of Appeals delivered an instructive judgement in the case of SARL Impérial Pub and SARL GPS against La Poste and its subsidiary, SAS Mediapost. Observing a decline in their business and the loss of major customers from 2010 onwards, two small operators active in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Abuse of dominant position: The Paris Court of appeal reminds operators complaining about predatory prices that they must bring at least sufficient circumstantial evidence allowing to presume an actual infringement (Imperial Pub/GPS/La Poste/Mediapost), 13 April 2016, Concurrences Nº 3-2016, Art. N° 81042, www.concurrences.com

Visites 521

All reviews