FOREIGN CASE LAW: PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT – MERGER – STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

Statute of limitations : The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirms that price increases following acquisition did not restart statute of limitations (Z Technologies c/ Lubrizol)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA 6th Circuit, May 23, 2014, Z Technologies v/Lubrizol, No. 2:12-cv-12206 The question of the statute of limitations for infringements has never been discussed in this column on US competition law, although it is very frequently raised in US antitrust litigation (On these aspects, see J. O. von Kalinowski, P. Sullivan, M. McGuirl, R. Folsom and F. Fine, "Antitrust Statutes of Limitations", in Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, 2nd Edition 162, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc./LexisNexis 2014, 8-162). A decision of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dated May 23, 2014 is an opportunity to return to this topic, which is of considerable

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Christophe Roda, Statute of limitations : The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirms that price increases following acquisition did not restart statute of limitations (Z Technologies c/ Lubrizol), 23 May 2014, Concurrences N° 3-2014, Art. N° 67843, pp. 217-219

Visites 307

All reviews