PROCEDURES: EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION – ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS – ACCESS TO THE FILE

Extraterritorial jurisdiction : The General Court of the European Union upholds the Commission’s findings and dismisses procedural breach claims (Intel)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The length of the judgment of the Court of First Instance delivered on 12 June 2014 is due not only to the complexity of the Intel case but also to the systematic over-abundance of its grounds. This choice, which is legitimate, may contribute to the proper understanding of the judgment by the parties. It is also, for the court, a way of dodging the cassation proceedings, or even deterring the appeal. In the final analysis, only law professors could deplore it, since overabundance "would attenuate the clarity or rigour of the solution of the dispute" (A. Perdriau, La pratique des arrêts civils de la Cour de Cassation, Paris, Litec 1993, p. 982). The

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Pascal Cardonnel, Extraterritorial jurisdiction : The General Court of the European Union upholds the Commission’s findings and dismisses procedural breach claims (Intel) , 12 June 2014, Concurrences N° 3-2014, Art. N° 68378, pp. 163-165

Visites 245

All reviews