CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – PRICE FIXING – DISTRIBUTION – EVIDENCE – PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY

Evidence: The Paris Court of Appeals confirms the fines imposed on one of the participants in the perfume case, ignoring conclusions by the Cour de cassation (Nocibé)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On April 10, 2014, the Paris Court of Appeal, after no less than three references after cassation, handed down its ruling in the following casesin the last part of the perfume case, the one concerning the distributor Nocibé. It will be recalled that in a judgment rendered on June 11, 2013the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation, sounding the death knell for the last hopes of suppliers and distributors, had come to put an almost definitive end to the "Perfumes" case, not to say the "Perfumes" saga, which had seen decision no. 06-D-04 bis of March 13, 2006 relating to practices in the luxury perfumery sector.In turn, the case was reformed by the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Evidence: The Paris Court of Appeals confirms the fines imposed on one of the participants in the perfume case, ignoring conclusions by the Cour de cassation (Nocibé), 10 April 2014, Concurrences N° 3-2014, Art. N° 68238, www.concurrences.com

Visites 230

All reviews