REGULATORY: ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS – MVNO – ACCESS CONDITIONS

MVNO : The French NRA issues a decision in a dispute between two telecommunications operators regarding their MVNO agreement (Oméa Télécom)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In its decision no. 2014-0192 of February 13, 2014, ARCEP ruled on a request for settlement of a dispute submitted in December 2013 by Oméa Télécom. Oméa Télécom is a Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO). Unlike the four network operators, MVNOs do not have their own network infrastructure. They provide their mobile communications services to subscribers, under their own brand name, from the network of the network operators by purchasing wholesale conversation minutes from them. In France, Oméa Télécom markets three mobile offers for individuals under the following brands: Virgin Mobile, Télé2 Mobile and Casino Mobile. The contractual relationship between Oméa

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Jean-Paul Tran Thiet, Orion Berg, MVNO : The French NRA issues a decision in a dispute between two telecommunications operators regarding their MVNO agreement (Oméa Télécom), 13 February 2014, Concurrences N° 3-2014, Art. N° 68390, pp. 175-177

Visites 203

All reviews