CASE COMMENTS : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE – SCOPE – COMMERCIAL PARTNER

Significant imbalance: The Lyon Court of Appeal declares inapplicable Article L. 442-6 I-2 of the commercial code in the absence of pre-existing relationship (Eve Monier Fontaine/Locam)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. If it were necessary to show that the specialisation of the courts called upon to apply Article L. 442-6 of the Commercial Code, instituted by the LME of 4 August 2008 and

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Significant imbalance: The Lyon Court of Appeal declares inapplicable Article L. 442-6 I-2 of the commercial code in the absence of pre-existing relationship (Eve Monier Fontaine/Locam), 16 May 2013, Concurrences N° 3-2013, Art. N° 53990, p. 96

Visites 407

All reviews