CASE COMMENTS : UNILATERAL PRACTICES - ABUSE OF A DOMINANT POSITION – ABSENCE OF A DOMINANT POSITION – LACK OF UNION INTEREST

Absence of a dominant position: The Court of Justice rejects a complaint against a European Commission decision not to investigate a complaint against practices in a non-dominated market (Omnis Group)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Trib. UE, 30 mai 2013, Omnis Group, aff. T-74/11

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The complaint of a Romanian software producer against Microsoft had been

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Catholic University of Louvain
    Belgium 94 contributions 134572 visits

Quotation

Anne-Lise Sibony, Absence of a dominant position: The Court of Justice rejects a complaint against a European Commission decision not to investigate a complaint against practices in a non-dominated market (Omnis Group), 30 May 2013, Concurrences N° 3-2013, Art. N° 53965, p. 79

Visites 153

All reviews