CASE COMMENTS : DISTRIBUTION - FRANCHISE – NON-REAFFILIATION - NOT MEMBERSHIP - PRIORITY SUPPLY - RIGHT OF PREEMPTION

Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal pronounces on the legality of clauses hindering the freedom of the franchisee during the execution and in the cessation of the contract, whereas the Toulouse Court of Appeal spreads any disorganization of the network because of the violation of a pact rather by the franchisee (Diapar/Carrefour proximité France; SCF/Distribution Casino France)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Toulouse, 20 March 2013, SCF c/ Distribution Casino France, RG

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Montpellier

Quotation

Didier Ferrier, Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal pronounces on the legality of clauses hindering the freedom of the franchisee during the execution and in the cessation of the contract, whereas the Toulouse Court of Appeal spreads any disorganization of the network because of the violation of a pact rather by the franchisee (Diapar/Carrefour proximité France; SCF/Distribution Casino France), 21 February 2013, Concurrences N° 3-2013, Art. N° 54091, p. 95

Visites 379

All reviews